Daniel Pelka: Do serious case reviews work?

Daniel Pelka Daniel Pelka died from a head injury in March 2012

Related Stories

A serious case review has said agencies missed opportunities to help four-year-old Daniel Pelka, who was murdered by his mother and her partner in Coventry. But how successful are such reviews in preventing similar cases?

Baby P, Victoria Climbie, Khyra Ishaq and now Daniel Pelka. Each case an example of shocking child cruelty, which resulted in inquiries, reports and recommendations.

Khalid Mahmood, Labour MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, is one of many who feels they have simply not worked.

His experience is based on, among others, the case of seven-year-old Khyra Ishaq, who starved to death in Birmingham in 2008.

Khyra Ishaq

Khyra Ishaq

What happened?

Khyra Ishaq, 7, starved to death in Birmingham in May 2008.

Serious Case Review findings

Poor communication between her school, social workers and other agencies.

Professionals "lost sight" of the need to protect Khyra and instead focused on her mother's rights.

Better assessments needed.

What has changed since?

Birmingham City Council and West Midlands Police said all recommendations had been implemented.

The city's children's service was labelled "inadequate" by inspectors in 2012.

"There's no accountability or responsibility. The way it is done is to protect professionals," he said.

"It's a defence mechanism. You keep hearing 'we've learned lessons', but the same things keep coming up."

Hundreds of such reports have been compiled in England and Wales over the last decade and more launched after a child's death or serious injury is thought to have been caused by neglect or abuse.

In the past, common themes in serious case reviews have included poor communication between agencies and failings in assessments and decision-making. Even some supporters of the system feel the recurrence of common failings is a "worrying" factor.

"Serious case reviews work well at a local level," David Tucker, head of policy at the NSPCC said.

"The difficulty is that a lot of the same learning points come up again and again."

"Communication is one of the most perennial themes," Annie Hudson, chief executive of The College of Social Work said.

"I can understand why the media and the public feel exasperated and say 'Why can't you get this right?'."

One man who has read more serious case reviews than most is Dr Peter Sidebotham, who heads a research team at the University of Warwick studying reviews for common child abuse risk factors.

He said while reviews often helped local agencies improve their services, "creative thinking" by government was needed to ensure the lessons were learned elsewhere in the country.

One of the main problems was busy social workers being unable to grasp the sheer amount of information contained in them, he said.

Baby P

Baby P

What happened?

Peter Connelly (Baby Peter) died aged 17 months in Haringey, north London, in August 2007. He suffered 50 injuries including a broken back, cracked ribs and numerous cuts and bruises.

Serious Case Review findings

Staff were too ready to believe the mother's account of what happened, despite Peter being on the at-risk register and receiving 60 visits from social workers, police and health professionals.

The majority of the staff involved were "incompetent" and his death should have been prevented.

What has changed since?

A visit by Ofsted in 2011 found improvements in some areas and rated Haringey safeguarding services as adequate.

Between 2009 and 2011, such reviews made an average of 46 recommendations each and action plans alone could run to 40 pages.

"Rise in caseloads mean you are dealing with the cases in front of you, rather than learning," Dr Sidebotham added.

Historically, the very format of serious case reviews, published in isolation by individual safeguarding boards, has also made it difficult for professionals across the country to learn from others' mistakes.

"At times there has been very little organisational learning, even within the same organisation, but certainly across other organisations," said Bridget Robb, chief executive of the British Association of Social Workers (BASW).

She said managers often did not pass on the findings of such reviews to social workers.

A survey by the association suggested 25% never saw a serious case review by their own local authority and 36% had never seen the actual Peter Connelly (Baby P) report, perhaps the most high-profile of all.

The survey, of 238 social workers, found 67% were "only sometimes" able to read recommendations from reports, and 17% never do. Of the respondents, 97% said they would like to see an online database of all reviews so they could access them easily.

Ms Robb said the number of agencies involved - combined with the workload - also made it difficult for social workers to communicate effectively with other agencies.

Alfie Goddard

What happened?

Alfie Goddard, aged 11 weeks, died in May 2008, after he was dropped from a height of five feet down the stairs at his home in Doncaster. He had several rib fractures and "fingertip shaped bruising".

Serious Case Review findings

Alfie and his older sibling should have been considered vulnerable.

All agencies failed to consider the impact the parents' experiences of homelessness, drug addiction and mental health problems would have on the children.

What has changed since?

Responsibility for children's services in Doncaster is being stripped from the local authority and handed to an independent trust, following a ruling by Education Secretary Michael Gove.

However, the Daniel Pelka report is one of the first to be carried out under a new serious case review system introduced in April.

It is designed to offer safeguarding boards greater flexibility and focus more on the child.

"There's more of a focus on underlying systems, rather than individual failings," Dr Sidebotham said. "Hopefully it make reports more positive and proactive, rather than reactive."

Andrew Webb, president of the Association of Directors of Children's Services, said one of the biggest tests for the new reviews would be whether they drove improvement in professional culture, making conversations between social workers, teachers, GPs, health visitors, police and others the norm.

Reviews in the past, he said, had been too inflexible and bureaucratic, with a focus on satisfying Ofsted guidelines, rather than improving actual practice.

"They could have been really insightful pieces of work but that could get lost in the SCR process," said Mr Webb.

"Sometimes, we would lose the opportunity to see how the system could be improved. After all you can follow the guidelines, but still make a bad decision and you can make a good decision without following procedure."

The Department for Education (DfE) refused to comment on the success of past serious case reviews.

It said the new system was designed to improve the quality of such reviews across the country and avoid mistakes being repeated.

The appointment of a chief social worker, as well as the creation of an independent panel of experts to advise safeguarding boards, would help provide improved standards across the country, the DfE claimed.

More on This Story

Related Stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites

More England stories



Copyright © 2016 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

This page is best viewed in an up-to-date web browser with style sheets (CSS) enabled. While you will be able to view the content of this page in your current browser, you will not be able to get the full visual experience. Please consider upgrading your browser software or enabling style sheets (CSS) if you are able to do so.